|
|
Database updates
Judgments
Cogent Ventures (India) Limited (Formerly Known As Bhupendra Capital and Finance Limitde), New Delhi vs (1) Shree Ram Infrastructure Limited (Formerly Known As Shree Ram Mills Limited), Mumbai; (2) Utility Premises Private Limited, New Delhi
[BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 20 Jun 2008]
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Whether appellant could make claim for the balance 2500.72 sq.mtrs of the total land wherein appellant and respondent Nos. 1 and 2 entered into the tripartite agreement for the development of 1, 20, 000 sq. ft of land and thereafter parties chose to enter into agreement and the appellant agreed to develop 4848.1 sq. mtrs and appropriate the sale proceeds for the said development? - Held, merely because reference has been made pursuant to the order passed u/s. 11(6) that, by itself, would not be a ground for grant of interim relief - In the agreement appellant's rights were restricted, by the clear reading of clauses 3, 4 and 5 of the said agreement to 4848.1 sq. mtrs only - No case has been made out by the appellant to establish its right over the balance 2500.72 sq. mtrs of land - Appeal dismissed.
|
Ticketmaster Corporation vs Im Panama, Donna Hawley
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 02 Jun 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesComplainant is Ticketmaster Corporation, Los Angeles, California, United States of America, represented by Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson, United States of
|
Veolia Environnement vs Whois Privacy Services, Provided By Domain Protect Llc/ "Veolia Environnement"
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 02 Jun 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Veolia Environnement, Paris, of France, represented by Cabinet Gide Loyrette Nouel, France.The Respondent is Whois privacy services, provided by Domain Protect LLC,
|
David Foox vs Bill Hicks
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 30 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is David Foox of Dallas, Texas, United States of America.The Respondent is Bill Hicks of Auckland, New Zealand.2. The Domain Names and RegistrarThe disputed domain
|
Cox Holdings Inc vs Frank Milan
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 30 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Cox Holdings Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, represented by Dow Lohnes, PLLC, United States of America.The Respondent is Frank Milan, Macon,
|
David Foox vs Kung Fox and Bill Hicks
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 30 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is David Foox of Dallas, Texas, United States of America.The Respondents are Kung Fox of Austin, California, United States of America and Bill Hicks of Auckland, New
|
Select Appointments (Holdings) Limited, Qualitair Aviation Group Limited vs Yunsung Yunsung, Dotiz Interactive
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 29 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainants are Select Appointments (Holdings) Limited and Qualitair Aviation Group Limited. The registered office for both of the Complainants is St Albans, United Kingdom of
|
Theodore Presser Company vs John Smith/Whois Protection
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 29 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Theodore Presser Company, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, United States of America, represented by Day Pitney LLP, United States of America.The Respondent is John
|
Marvel Characters, Inc vs Superherosquad.Com Private Registrant, Dreamhost Web Hosting
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 28 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesComplainant is Marvel Characters, Inc. ("Complainant"), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, with a principal place of business located in Beverly Hills,
|
Mastercard International Incorporated vs Abadaba S.A., Administrador De Dominios
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 28 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is MasterCard International Incorporated, of United States of America, represented by Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson, United States of America.The
|
Seoul Laser Dieboard System Company, Limited vs Sds Usa, Inc
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 28 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesComplainant is Seoul Laser Dieboard System Co., Ltd., of United States of America, represented by Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP, United States of America.Respondent is SDS
|
Accor vs This Domain May Be For Sale Or Lease
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 28 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Accor, Evry Cedex, France represented by Cabinet Dreyfus & Associes, France.The Respondent is This Domain May be for Sale or Lease, Queensland, Australia.2. The
|
Gookinaid Erg, Inc vs Valda Krievane
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 28 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Gookinaid ERG, Inc., of San Diego, California, United States of America, represented by Aaron M. Fennimore, United States of America.The Respondent is Valda
|
Archipel, Inc vs Individual Kim@Yunsik.Com / Kim Yunsik
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 28 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Archipel, Inc. of Florida, United States of America ("USA").The Respondent is individual kim@yunsik.com / Kim Yunsik of Republic of Korea.2. The Domain Name and
|
Lonely Planet Publications Pty Limited vs Moniker Privacy Services / Darren Abela
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 27 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd, Footscray, Australia, represented by Griffith Hack Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys, Australia.The Respondent is Moniker Privacy
|
Valero Energy Corporation, Valero Refining and Marketing Company vs Linkz Internet Services
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 27 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Valero Energy Corporation and Valero Refining and Marketing of San Antonio, Texas, United States of America, represented by Stumpf Farrimond PC, United States of
|
Nutraquest, Inc. f/k/a Cytodyne Technologies, Inc vs Xenadrine Rfa 1 Superstore (a.k.a. Xenadrine Superstore)
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 27 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Nutraquest, Inc. f/k/a Cytodyne Technologies, Inc., Manasquan, New Jersey, United States of America, represented by Gibbons PC, United States of America.The
|
Building Supplies R'Us Limited vs Global Graphics Associates Limited
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 27 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Building Supplies R'Us Limited, Worcester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, LLP, of Birmingham,
|
Atlas Copco Aktiebolag vs Pt. Indolinux Nusantara
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 27 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Atlas Copco Aktiebolag, Nacka, Sweden, represented by Atlas Copco North America LLC, United States of America.The Respondent is PT. Indolinux Nusantara, Jakarta,
|
Regan Campbell Ward-Mccann vs Site Services International, Richard Sorensen
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 26 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Regan Campbell Ward-McCann of New York, New York, United States of America, represented by Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, of New York, New York, United States of
|
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag vs Transure Enterprise Limited
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 26 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, of Switzerland, internally represented by Jerome Rhein, Switzerland.The Respondent is Transure Enterprise Ltd., of British Virgin Islands,
|
Infonxx.Inc vs Lou Kerner, Wildsites.Com
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 26 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainant is Infonxx.Inc, of New York, New York, United States of America, represented by Sofer & Haroun LLP, United States of America.The Respondent is Lou Kerner,
|
Ticketmaster Corporation vs Darcy Andrade
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 23 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesComplainant is Ticketmaster Corporation of Los Angeles, California, United States of America, represented by Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP of Chicago,
|
Societe Nationale Des Chemins De Fer Francais (Sncf) vs Dokoslov Limited
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 23 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesComplainant is Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer Francais (SNCF), Paris, France, represented by Cabinet Santarelli, France.Respondent is Dokoslov ltd, Ouebec, Canada.2. The Domain
|
Societe Anonyme Des Eaux Minerales d'Evian and Societe Des Eaux De Volvic vs Beroca Holdings B.V.I. Limited
[WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, 23 May 2008]
The Administrative Panel Decision was as follows :-1. The PartiesThe Complainants are Societe Anonyme des Eaux Minerales d'Evian and Societe des Eaux de Volvic, of Evian and Volvic, respectively, France (the "Complainants"), represented by Cabinet
|
|